01
Find costly build risks.
Surface manufacturability, assembly, service, inspection, and scoped physics issues before teams or suppliers build assumptions.
CAD/BOM - hidden build risks - first build
Catch hardware build risks before prototype rework.
AssemblyRoute AI reviews CAD, drawings, BOMs, specs, and notes before prototype builds, RFQs, first articles, FAT, or pilot builds, then turns hidden manufacturability, assembly, service, inspection, supplier/internal question, and scoped load/deformation risks into practical build-package corrections.
Human-reviewed sprint in 24-48h after files and scope are confirmed. Not certification, regulatory approval, or final engineering sign-off.
Today Build-Readiness Sprint - hidden build-risk pass Next Physical build - first article - inspection Path Assembly/test handoff
Product wedge
Start with one package. Build the operating layer.
The first product is intentionally narrow: one focused CAD/BOM/drawing package reviewed for hidden build risks, practical design/package corrections, route decisions, RFQ scope when needed, internal/supplier questions, and assembly/test readiness before physical build money is spent.
02
Shape build-ready scope.
Translate findings into route logic, RFQ scope when needed, make/buy split, internal/supplier questions, and acceptance checks.
03
Preserve decisions for build.
Keep gates and decisions structured so humans can review them and agents can reuse them across RFQ, assembly, inspection, and test.
Entry points
Different engineering bottlenecks. One build-readiness layer.
Each path starts where technical packages usually get expensive: manufacturability, package corrections, RFQ scope, routing, assembly handoff, or prototype constraints. The output still converges on one Build-Readiness Sprint.
Hardware prototype
Risk review before the first hardware prototype build.
For prototype teams with CAD/BOM evidence, assembly constraints, and questions about what should change before build spend.
RFQ package
CAD and BOM, but no build-ready scope.
For teams that need material, finish, quantity, inspection, assumptions, and internal/supplier questions organized before build or outreach.
Build review
Manufacturability feedback before expensive rework.
For hardware founders and engineers who need process risks, practical corrections, make/buy logic, and next-step recommendations.
Low-volume build
Assembly and test handoff, not just parts.
For fixtures, cabinets, equipment modules, robotic subsystems, and first-article builds where inspection and FAT/test clarity matter.
Route planning
Manufacturing route before prototype quotes.
For teams deciding what gets fabricated, bought, finished, inspected, assembled, tested, and split between internal build and suppliers.
Not sure
Send the package and let us scope the right sprint.
If the assembly crosses several paths, start from one focused CAD/BOM package. Complex work is scoped after files, constraints, and build decision are clear.
Start intakeSample report
A real artifact, not just a promise.
The sample report shows what customers and investors can judge: hidden build risks, evidence quality, practical corrections, RFQ split when needed, supplier/internal questions, and next actions.
Build-Readiness ReportPRSM P8.001.021 electrical cabinet
Blocker
Gate E-01 / CAD-to-assembly release risk
Risk
M3 standoffs need pull-out and torque-out evidence
Check
VFD airflow and service clearance must be verified
Decision
RFQ hold until CAD correction and evidence update
Show the output early.
A buyer should not have to imagine what the Build-Readiness Sprint returns. The report sample gives a concrete artifact before the sales conversation starts.
Founder insight
Builds fail when CAD evidence becomes production guesswork.
Hardware teams do not lose weeks only because parts are hard to make. They lose weeks because prototype, RFQ, FAT, and pilot-build packages mix real build risks, missing evidence, design/package corrections, and assumptions in one messy thread.
Specific first customers. Robotics teams, industrial equipment and medical prototypes builders, electrical cabinet projects, fixtures, enclosures, and other low-volume metal-first assemblies.
Structured output layer. Build risks, practical corrections, build questions, RFQ scope when needed, and decisions are structured so humans can review them and agents can reuse them.
Expansion path. The Build-Readiness Sprint creates the first proof point. Then AssemblyRoute becomes the operating layer from design release to physical build, supplier routing, first article, inspection, and test handoff.
Built for serious intake
Clear scope before anyone builds or quotes.
A Build-Readiness Sprint is narrow on purpose: enough evidence to find hidden build risks, shape practical corrections and internal/supplier questions, and decide whether the package is ready for prototype build, RFQ, first article, FAT, or pilot build.
Files we can review.
CAD/STEP assemblies, BOMs, drawings, PDFs, supplier notes, photos, redlines, and known build issues.
Boundaries are explicit.
The first sprint is not regulatory certification, final engineering sign-off, or a substitute for qualified supplier validation.
NDA-ready workflow.
We can start from sanitized files, sign an NDA, and keep sensitive project context out of public samples.
Build-Readiness Sprint
A build-readiness decision package in 24-48 hours.
One focused CAD/BOM/drawing package reviewed for hidden manufacturability, assembly, service, inspection, and scoped load/deformation risks, plus practical corrections, RFQ scope when needed, internal/supplier questions, and first-article/FAT checks.
Starting at $2,500
For one focused metal-first assembly. Complex electromechanical packages, supplier outreach, and quote comparison are scoped after intake.
Get a Build-Readiness SprintSend one focused CAD/BOM package.
We will confirm scope and return hidden build risks, practical corrections, route/RFQ scope when needed, internal/supplier questions, and assembly/test handoff. Complex packages are scoped after intake.
